-
Website
http://ybpguide.com -
Original page
http://ybpguide.com/2007/09/12/you-black-guys-are-racist/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Sulumits Retsambew
4 comments · 1 points
-
Twanna A Hines funkybrownchick
4 comments · 2 points
-
Toussaint
4 comments · 1 points
-
abercrombie
3 comments · 1 points
-
talentdiva
3 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
i think the phenomenon you speak of is also reflected in entertainment. black comedians and entertainers have a lot more leeway satirizing and mocking other cultures than whites do. but, i could see how whites, for instance, who perceive themselves to be in a position of power or superiority could "look down" on said behavior and laugh and not make a big stink. after all, we may be able to crack jokes and entertain, but there is still so far to go to get to the same "level" of power, influence, legacy and opportunity.
on the other side, we have to make a stink. because not only would we have to deal with the offensiveness, we still have to deal with how the offensiveness and the prejudices and stereotypes related to them can keep us out of school (dying affirmative action), get us trapped, assaulted and beaten in a home for a week (google "6 arrested in weeklong attack on woman"), or disenfranchised generally.
do most blacks have issues with white people because they are simply white (i.e. look different) or because of the implied intention and history of white culture with respect to black culture?
i've never believed in 'reverse racism'. how can you be prejudice against a race that has implicit privilege?
I too, took similar sociology and Afam courses so I am familiar with the definition of racisim. As far as definition goes, I don't believe minority groups can be racist. We can however, be discriminating and ignorant to the point that its harmful. We can breed hate and pass on ignorance.
In my isolated experience, I have been in positions of hiring people. That puts me in a position of power where I can affect the life of an individual but not a whole race. I can, in this position, effect one person's livelihood but I in this position could never oppress a whole people.
I guess that is the difference in all of the "isms" verses discrimination.
Some sociologists have defined racism as a system of group privilege. In Portraits of White Racism David Wellman (1993) has defined racism as "culturally sanctioned beliefs, which, regardless of intentions involved, defend the advantages whites have because of the subordinated position of racial minorities,” (Wellman 1993: x). Sociologists Noel Cazenave and Darlene Alvarez Maddern define racism as “...a highly organized system of 'race'-based group privilege that operates at every level of society and is held together by a sophisticated ideology of color/'race' supremacy. Racist systems include, but cannot be reduced to, racial bigotry,” (Cazenave and Maddern 1999: 42).
http://www.racialicious.com/2007/09/13/bigot-pr...
A black racist doesn't have the means to truly be a destructive force.
So, yes. Sometimes better educated or financially capable people are discriminated against by less priviledged people. In some circumstances such people may have power over a situation and make discriminatory decisions - excluding you and favoring someone more like them.
Sometime it is about numbers as well as force. Apartheid of course stands as an example to buck that trend but then was Idi Amin's behaviour not racist when he expelled Asians from Uganda? What of the conflict in Sudan between the more Arabic northerners in comparison to the Southerners? And what of Mugabe in Zimbabwe?
I am not sure I follow this line of thinking.
Again, numbers have nothing to do with who cna and can not be racist.
How so? Or is this just an American thing?
Both here in the UK and of course in the US blacks represent 4% and 16% respectively of the countries therefore we would see whites as the oppressor because they are the dominant race and because of the more recent histories of Jim Crow, colonisations, etc. Would we say the same if we were in the Middle East, or South East Asia for example? I doubt it, hence my comment about whether it is an American position.
Racism is simply a prejudicial thought, belief or word about a race collectively. Perpetuated mainly by the dominant culture of that country, whether it is in the US, Sudan, Japan or Australia.
For the record I lecture on history across the diaspora so don't get it twisted.
God knows what you're teaching given the obvious questions you're asking here.
Now, lets see, over a fifth of the lynchings that happened in the state of Virginia were white people getting lynched, so don't try and claim that you were the only ones who had that happen. Sold blacks? Yes, white people did that, but who sold them to the white people in the first place? Other black people. White people didn't go raiding black villages, black tribes fought and captured slaves, then sold those slaves to white traders. Raped blacks? Yes...But black people commit over 50% of the rape crimes, and make up only 13% of the population.
You have uncritically and probably unwittingly adopted such a way of thinking, and are clearly beginning to realise that, whilst racism exists of course, it is in fact practiced by both black and white and that not every incident of what appears to you as a black person as racism, is in fact as a result of your skin colour.
See this documentray video on ythe Origin of Political Correctness:
http://swindonnationalists.blogspot.com/2008/02...
Still if there are such incidents taking place where white people are critisized by the black ones, it can be taken as an exception.